Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

SASE stands for Secure Access Service Edge, a concept in network security that refers to the integration of security functions, such as VPN, firewall, and identity management, into a single service. The goal of SASE is to provide secure and flexible access to network resources, both on-premises and in the cloud, for an increasingly remote and mobile workforce.

Many SASE vendors will focus on how they have the components that make up SASE, but the implementation of their solution results in inconsistent services, poor manageability and high latency. Read more about how SASE solutions should be evaluated here.

The following are some of the pros and cons of SASE:

Pros:

1. Simplified security architecture: SASE consolidates multiple security functions, such as VPN, firewall, and DDoS protection, into a single service, making it easier to manage and deploy.
2. Improved security and performance: SASE integrates security functions with the network edge, reducing latency and improving overall security by reducing the attack surface.
3. Flexibility and scalability: SASE can be scaled up or down as needed, making it a more flexible solution than traditional on-premise security solutions.
4. Cost savings: SASE can reduce the costs associated with managing multiple security solutions and deploying dedicated hardware. If you go with a single-vendor solution, you do not need ownership of that infrastructure.

Cons:

1. Dependence on cloud infrastructure: SASE requires a reliable and secure cloud infrastructure, which may not be available in all regions.
2. Integration challenges: Integrating SASE with existing security solutions and network infrastructure can be complex and requires significant technical expertise.
3. Data privacy and security concerns: SASE involves transmitting sensitive data to the cloud, which raises concerns about data privacy and security. Those that do not wish to expand their data boundary are encouraged to self-host instead.
4. Lack of control over security policies: With SASE, security policies are managed by the service provider, which may not provide the same level of control as traditional on-premise solutions.
5. Performance limitations: Depending on the implementation, SASE may introduce additional latency and reduce performance compared to traditional security solutions.
6. Complexity of management: SASE can introduce additional complexity to the management of security policies and configurations, requiring specialized skills and resources.
7. Lack of customization: SASE solutions may not offer the same level of customization as traditional security solutions, making it difficult to adapt to specific security requirements.
8. Vendor lock-in: SASE solutions are often provided by a single vendor, which can limit the ability to switch to another solution in the future or integrate with other security solutions.
9. Integration with legacy systems: Integrating SASE with legacy systems and infrastructure can be challenging, requiring significant effort and resources.
10. Cost unpredictability: The cost of SASE solutions can be difficult to predict, especially for organizations with unpredictable or rapidly changing network traffic patterns.